Football Darwinism

People should stop the argument that Jose Mourinho is "bad for football". After all, without Mourinho Barcelona wouldn't exists as it is today

Darwin

By now, it is obvious that Jose Mourinho is extremely important for football. What is not so obvious is how much Mourinho is essential for attacking football.

Why is Mourinho, a manager synonymous with defensive and depressing football, good for attacking, free flowing football? It’s evolution, baby.

Predator and prey evolve together. The prey is part of the predator’s environment, and the predator dies if it does not get food, so it evolves whatever is necessary in order to eat the prey: speed, stealth, camouflage (to hide while approaching the prey), a good sense of smell, sight, hearing (to find the prey), immunity to the prey’s poison, poison (to kill the prey),the right kind of mouth parts or digestive system, etc.

Likewise, the predator is part of the prey’s environment, and the prey dies if it is eaten by the predator, so it evolves whatever is necessary to avoid being eaten.

The fastest lions are able to catch food and eat, so they survive and reproduce, and gradually, faster lions make up more and more of the population. The fastest zebras are able to escape the lions, so they survive and reproduce, and gradually, faster zebras make up more and more of the population.

An important thing to realize is that as both organisms become faster in order to adapt to their environments, their relationship remains the same: because they are both getting faster, neither gets faster in relation to the other. This is true in all predator-prey relationships.

That’s the great Pendulum of life, and it’s the same with football. Without great defensive football, attacking football would grow stale. Great defensive football leads to great attacking football.

Purists often argue that Mourinho is ‘bad for football’ because, as Jorge Valdano once said, it looks like “shit hanging from a stick”.

However, without the evolution of Mourinho defensive systems, Barcelona wouldn’t have gotten so lethal; without the presentation of Mourinho’s tactics to the Premier League, Manchester United wouldn’t have been such a goal machine as it was with Cristiano Ronaldo and Wayne Rooney in the 2007-2009 seasons. It could be argued that Wenger’s Arsenal didn’t really evolve and that’s why it suffers. It could be argued that teams such as Bolton and Sunderland now play better football because of Mourinho’s evolution.

So this dynamics  attacking football finds answers to evolved defensive football and then defensive football finds answers to evolved attacking football are important to the long great story of football.

 

3 Comments

  1. Yoav Borowitz added these pithy words on March 16, 2011 | Permalink

    It all sounds nice and right but:
    Mourinho is not so good for football if his teams are not beautiful to watch (I’m not saying that all his teams were not quality. And some were even pretty nice to watch. But overall, that’s not the story. When watching a Mourinho team one gets mostly bored). Therefore I don’t think he is so good for football although he sure contricutes to the evoloution of the game. But a lot of other thins contricute to this evolution. A new diet drink also contributes).

  2. Yair Neumann added these pithy words on February 12, 2012 | Permalink

    In Diary of a Bad Year by Coetzee there is a passage in which the hero talks about Dostoyevsky’s Brothers Karamazov, about Ch 5 in which Ivan gives back the admission tickets to heaven.

    The hero of Coetzzee’s novel cries gratefully whenever he reads Ivan’s speech, not because he agrees with it but because it is rhetorically so good that if ever someone beats Ivan argument it will be the best ever:

    “Glory be! At last I see it before me, the battle pitched on the highest ground! If to anyone (Alyosha, for instance) it shall be given to vanquish Ivan, by word or by example, then indeed the word of Christ will be forever vindicated! And therefore one thinks, Slava, Fyodor Michailovich! May your name resound for ever in the halls of fame!”

    Same with Mourinho, if you love attacking football you have to love him, because his teams pose the argument in favour of defensive football with the most strength, the battle is pitched on the highest ground so to speak, and to beat them the attacking team has to be sublime.

  3. Ouriel Daskal added these pithy words on February 12, 2012 | Permalink

    Amazing comment Yair Neumann

6 Trackbacks

  1. Pro Blogger News on March 16, 2011

    Football Darwinism…

    [...]WHAT TO DO NOW? Post a coment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. POST A COMENT. Your email is[...]…

  2. [...] what you want to say about Jose Mourinho, but one thing is certain – his teams will fight ’til they’re [...]

  3. [...] of nature – you can’t say what’s more beautiful because that’s judging nature. And nature is nature. You can’t judge [...]

  4. [...] Why Mourinho-football is good for the game, perfectly explained. – soccerissue.com [...]

  5. [...] shows that the game has evolved into mixed martial arts – players are turning into marathon running warriors – super [...]

  6. [...] Tactics change because of many variables: offside rule changes, scientific advances, politics etc. Style, though, is eternal. When learned properly. [...]

 Subscribe in a reader